<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: #36 The luminous gospel of transcendental universalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenakedtheologian.com/2009/10/11/36-the-luminous-gospel-of-transcendental-universalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenakedtheologian.com/2009/10/11/36-the-luminous-gospel-of-transcendental-universalism/</link>
	<description>This blog is devoted to stripped-down theology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 02:21:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://thenakedtheologian.com/2009/10/11/36-the-luminous-gospel-of-transcendental-universalism/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenakedtheologian.com/?p=1019#comment-226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On your short comments about Forrest Church, perhaps you can explain to me two things about Church&#039;s theology

1) &quot;Religion is the human response to the inevitability of death&quot;. I thing Forrest also said that religion is &quot;being alive but knowing that we have to die&quot;. This means absolutely nothing to me. I think religion is the gathering of people to search for the meaning of life, to share one another&#039;s joys and sorrows, and to celebrate life.&quot; This is my own formulation and I think people can understand this but not what Forrest suggests. Can you help me here? 

He also said, as stated above, that the &quot;inevitability (of death) gave meaning to human love because the more love we found and gave, the more we risked losing it&quot;. Once again, this is something I don&#039;t understand. First I don&#039;t think love is something you &quot;find&quot; and then something you &quot;lose&quot;. Even if this is an attempt at poetry, I think it limps. Further, even if love can be &quot;found&quot; and &quot;lost&quot;and this is something we&quot;risk&quot; how is this the reason for religion?

2) God is something &quot;greater than all and yet present in each&quot;. What does this mean? If this God is the &quot;most liberal..&quot; and is munificent and open-handed&quot; then, I presume Forrest believe that God is a person. Is that true?

John]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On your short comments about Forrest Church, perhaps you can explain to me two things about Church&#8217;s theology</p>
<p>1) &#8220;Religion is the human response to the inevitability of death&#8221;. I thing Forrest also said that religion is &#8220;being alive but knowing that we have to die&#8221;. This means absolutely nothing to me. I think religion is the gathering of people to search for the meaning of life, to share one another&#8217;s joys and sorrows, and to celebrate life.&#8221; This is my own formulation and I think people can understand this but not what Forrest suggests. Can you help me here? </p>
<p>He also said, as stated above, that the &#8220;inevitability (of death) gave meaning to human love because the more love we found and gave, the more we risked losing it&#8221;. Once again, this is something I don&#8217;t understand. First I don&#8217;t think love is something you &#8220;find&#8221; and then something you &#8220;lose&#8221;. Even if this is an attempt at poetry, I think it limps. Further, even if love can be &#8220;found&#8221; and &#8220;lost&#8221;and this is something we&#8221;risk&#8221; how is this the reason for religion?</p>
<p>2) God is something &#8220;greater than all and yet present in each&#8221;. What does this mean? If this God is the &#8220;most liberal..&#8221; and is munificent and open-handed&#8221; then, I presume Forrest believe that God is a person. Is that true?</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

