• About

The Naked Theologian

~ A blog for stripped-down theology

The Naked Theologian

Category Archives: Theology

#5 Martin Luther King, Jr., More Exposed

13 Tuesday Jan 2009

Posted by TheNakedTheologian in God, Spirituality, Theology

≈ 4 Comments

dreamstime_2946477

For Martin Luther King, Jr., God didn’t become a living reality until he discovered the presence of God in his everyday experience. Not until he had felt an inner calm (that he believed was not his own) and had discovered resources of strength (that he believed were not his own) did King conclude God was at work in his life. Not until he had felt a sustaining hope (that he believed was not his own) in spite of threats to his life, discouraging setbacks, and the hardships of a bitter struggle, did he conclude God was at work in his life.  

Some call the calm and strength and hope King felt, salvation.  Others, resurrection.  They experience tranquility in the face of tragedy, the whence of which they can’t explain.  They experience courage in the face of danger, the whence of which they can’t explain.  They experience hope in the face of failure, the whence of which they can’t explain.  They become convinced the whence is God.  God has saved them.  God has resurrected them. 

Is God at work?  Although we can argue about the whence of such experiences, the experiences themselves cannot (and should not) be denied.

Before he discovered God’s active presence in his life, King had believed that God was a metaphysical category, a remote form without content.  Many persons, not just King, have a God who seems remote, removed from our everyday lives, removed from our ordinary problems and concerns, removed from our deepest sorrows and greatest triumphs, ‘out there’ somewhere, seemingly unreachable, seemingly unconcerned.  

The technical term used (not just by naked theologians) for this kind of God is ‘transcendent’ because that God lies outside or transcends the human realm.  

If a quick glance at our history can serve as a reliable guide, most human beings have little tolerance for vast distances between themselves and a transcendent God.  Even a theologian like King who enjoyed and excelled in abstract thinking could not leave God in the heavens—God did not become a ‘living’ reality for him until he perceived God as present in the commonplace–in the human realm.

The technical term used (not just by naked theologians) for this kind of God is ‘immanent’ derived from the Latin, in manere, ‘to remain within’.  

The history of human theological ideas shows that human beings who believe or have faith in a transcendent God often find ways to ‘reach up’ to God or to understand God as ‘reaching down’ to them. This human-God distance has been breached in creative ways—think of Moses who sees God’s backside.  Is prayer not also a way to breach the distance?  Contemplation?  Reading Scripture?  Practicing Kabbalah?  The list is long.

When King writes, “in many instances I have felt the power of God transforming the fatigue of despair into the buoyancy of hope,” he reveals that, for him, God ‘reached down’ and transformed him personally.   King’s God has a loving purpose and controls the universe; God is a cosmic companion in the struggle for righteousness; God is a benign power with feeling and will; God is responsive to the deepest yearnings of the human heart (though King does not say how).  

Is King’s God still too distant or too immanent?  

Whether too distant or too immanent, King’s God sustained him in his work to secure a different, better world. 

How do you bridge the distance (if any) between yourself and the divine?  How does your God sustain you?  How does your God sustain you in making the world a better place for more people? 

It’s your turn to expose yourself.  

#4 Martin Luther King Jr.’s Theology, Exposed

04 Sunday Jan 2009

Posted by TheNakedTheologian in God, Religion, Theology

≈ 4 Comments

dreamstime_42834221When we talk about the work of exemplary men and women, we usually focus on their achievements and pay little attention to their theological convictions–as if, somehow, their actions could be divorced from their beliefs.  There’s no doubt, though, that the ceaseless labors of many prophetic people are tied to their strong religious convictions, convictions that are not peripheral, but central to their work. 

The Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., illustrates this point.  We are well informed about what he accomplished and the world he helped change, but how many of us can explain the theological grounding of his visionary leadership?  In the passage below, we discover that, in his struggle for righteousness, King believed in, and relied on, the sustaining and loving power of a personal God:

“…in the past years the idea of a personal God was little more than a metaphysical category which I found theologically and philosophically satisfying.  Now it is a living reality that has been validated in the experience of every day life… In the midst of outer dangers I have felt an inner calm and known resources of strength that only God could give.  In many instances I have felt the power of God transforming the fatigue of despair into the buoyancy of hope.  I am convinced that the universe is under the control of a loving purpose and that in the struggle for righteousness man has cosmic companionship.  Behind the harsh appearances of the world there is a benign power.  To say God is personal is not to make him an object among other objects or attribute to him the finiteness and limitations of human personality; it is to take what is finest and noblest in our consciousness and affirm its perfect existence in him.  It is certainly true that human personality is limited, but personality as such involves no necessary limitations.  It simply means self-consciousness and self-direction.  So in the truest sense of the word, God is a living God.  In him there is feeling and will, responsive to the deepest yearnings of the human heart:  thus God both evokes and answers prayers.”

Martin Luther King, Jr.  “Pilgrimage to Nonviolence,” in I Have A Dream:  Writings and Speeches that Changed the World, ed. James Melvin Washington, 54-62 (New York:  HarperCollins Publishers, 1986), 61.

#3 The spin on truth

02 Friday Jan 2009

Posted by TheNakedTheologian in God, Religion, Theology

≈ 8 Comments

dreamstime_6640001Whatever our opinion about God, we all have one.  And that opinion rings true to us (even if we’re willing to revisit it, test it, adjust it, etc.).  If we only half-believed our opinion (is that even possible?), then our inner conviction would never rise above the level of platitude.  We adopt, or retain, the position that we find personally satisfying.  

Some theological views about God are:

1.   God exists

2.   God does not exist (dogmatic atheism)

3.   God might exist but whether God exists or not doesn’t impact life (practical atheism)

4.   Many gods exist

5.   There’s a good power in the universe and everything’s going to turn out okay

6.  There’s a cranky power in the universe and everything’s going to turn out badly (just kidding)

7.   God has never become incarnate

8.   Jesus is God incarnate

9.   Krishna is god incarnate

10.  To talk to God, I must face Mecca

11.  To talk to God, I must face the Wailing Wall

Each of these statements is a claim about truth.  Even uncertainty is a truth claim; we’ve decided that uncertainty is the truth.  Because we usually have several opinions about God, it’s fair to ask ourselves whether our claims make sense as a whole (are they coherent), whether they fit our everyday experience, and whether they are highly probable or less so.  

Most importantly, we’ll want to ask whether our opinions provoke and inspire us to live morally responsive and responsible lives.  We’ll also want to ask whether our opinions provoke and inspire us to help others flourish too.

#2 God: the mutilated word of appeal

28 Sunday Dec 2008

Posted by TheNakedTheologian in God, Philosophy, Religion, Theology

≈ 3 Comments

 

dreamstime_63224261Do we administer CPR to God or leave God for dead?  Even after the Holocaust, the Jewish philosopher and theologian, Martin Buber, refused to turn his back on God and walk (or run) away.  Why not?  He explained his thinking in his book, Eclipse of God:

“[‘God’] is the most heavy-laden of all human words.  None has become so soiled, so mutilated. 

Just for this reason I may not abandon it. 

Generations of men have laid the burden of their anxious lives upon this word and weighed it to the ground; it lies in the dust and bears their whole burden.  The races of man with their religious factions have torn the word to pieces; they have killed for it and died for it, and it bears their fingermarks and their blood. 

Where might I find a word like it to describe the highest! 

If I took the purest, most sparkling concept…I could not capture the presence of Him whom the generations of men have honoured and degraded with their awesome living and dying.  I do indeed mean Him whom the hell-tormented and heaven-storming generations of men mean.  Certainly, they draw caricatures and write ‘God’ underneath; they murder one another and say ‘in God’s name’…  

And just for this reason is not the word ‘God,’ the word of appeal, the word which has become a name, consecrated in all human tongues for all times? 

We must esteem those who interdict it because they rebel against the injustice and wrong which are so readily referred to ‘God’ for authorization.  But we may not give it up… 

We cannot cleanse the word ‘God’ and we cannot make it whole; but, defiled and mutilated as it is, we can raise it from the ground and set it over an hour of great care.”

– Martin Buber, Eclipse of God (London:  Gollancz, 1953), 17-18.

#1 Skeptical? Some bare facts about theology

25 Thursday Dec 2008

Posted by TheNakedTheologian in God, Religion, Spirituality, Theology

≈ 1 Comment

Skeptical young man

 

Here’s a test.  Have you asked yourself any of these questions:  What is my purpose in life?  What counts as a good life?  Do I (fill in your name here) matter?  Do I have a soul?  What is a soul?  Why is there so much suffering in the world?  Why have I suffered so much?  To whom am I speaking when, filled with gratitude, I find myself whispering “thank you, thank you”?  Where can I find comfort when I can’t take another piece of bad news?  What exactly IS my relationship to the divine?  Does that relationship entail any special responsibility on my part?  What are my moral principles and what am I willing to sacrifice to live by them?  Why should I be moral, why should I even be kind?  How can I love my neighbor—what exactly does that mean in practical terms?  What can I know of God?  

Okay, so you’ve got the picture.  Some of these questions could be considered philosophical because they’re asking basic questions about life.  Still, if you’ve read this far, then the God-dimension, or the vertical dimension, enters (or sneaks) into your questions and into your in-progress answers. 

Although you may not have known it, you’ve been theologians all along.  If you’re a dogmatic atheist and you discount the idea of God altogether, then you might consider yourself a philosopher, in the contemporary sense of philosopher anyway.  Because in the ancient world, philosophers like Plato and Plotinus considered ‘doing’ theology a key part of their work.  The idea of God was at the core of their musings—Plato called God, ‘the Good,’ and Plotinus called God, ‘the One.’  Now, while you may be theologians without knowing it, ‘doing’ theology means being intentional about asking questions like the ones above, and intentional about looking for thoughtful, rational answers. 

‘Doing’ theology is a kind of disciplined inquiry.  And that’s what this blog is all about.

Newer posts →

The Naked Theologian

Unknown's avatar

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Top Posts

  • #74 After the "Death of God," new gods?
  • #73 Will Her Methodist Faith Help HRC Make a Comeback?
  • #72 Trump's White Evangelical Voters: What Were They Thinking?

Recent Posts

  • #74 After the “Death of God,” new gods?
  • #73 Will Her Methodist Faith Help HRC Make a Comeback?
  • #72 Trump’s White Evangelical Voters: What Were They Thinking?

Recent Comments

Tulayhah's avatarTulayhah on #69 How To Read the Qur…
clinton's avatarclinton on #18 God and the Devil duke it…
marysedl's avatarmarysedl on #72 Trump’s White Evange…
DaCoot's avatarDaCoot on #11 What’s in a name? Go…
Home And Spirit's avatarHome And Spirit on #68 Suffering on Trial

Categories

Ethics God Philosophy of Religion Prayer Religion Religious Philosophy Spiritual Exercises Spirituality Theological Ethics Theology

Posts by Category

  • Ethics (15)
  • God (55)
  • Interpretation (1)
  • Philosophy (5)
  • Philosophy of Religion (27)
  • Philosophy of Religions (8)
  • Politics (1)
  • Prayer (11)
  • Religion (57)
  • Religious Philosophy (26)
  • Spiritual Exercises (9)
  • Spirituality (15)
  • Theological Ethics (26)
  • Theology (55)

Archives

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Naked Theologian
    • Join 67 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Naked Theologian
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...