
What did Zuckerman find after living in a typical Danish city and interviewing some 150 Danes and Swedes about their religious views?
- 25% believe in a personal God
- 10% believe in hell
- 7% believe that God the Bible is the literal word of God
- 100% identify themselves as Christians
In his book, Zuckerman argues, in part, against scholars of religion who claim that human beings are naturally religious. Against this assertion, Zuckerman shows that Danes and Swedes do not look to religion or God for answers about the meaning of life and death.
Perhaps more interesting was Zuckerman’s discovery that these questions only rarely crossed the minds of Danes and Swedes. His contacts simply lacked curiosity about God and about the meaning of life and death. Indeed, the examples he provided, based on interviews and ordinary day-to-day interactions, reveal that, in Denmark:
- Questions about why bad things happen are not central to everyday life
- Religion, God, and the meaning of life rarely come up
- When asked about the meaning of life, people answered that there is no meaning
- When asked what gives them reasons to live, they cited friends and family
- When asked about death, they said it was part of life
However, this picture is in tension with several other facts:
- The majority of Danes and Swedes pay taxes to the Lutheran Church without complaint
- They tend to baptize their children
- They get married in Church
- They follow the Lutheran teaching of being kind to their neighbors
- Tensions exist between the Lutheran population and the growing Muslim population
Zuckerman postulates that, for Danes and Swedes, the religious practices and institutions of the Lutheran Church have become cultural, secular vehicles. If his assessment is correct, then Denmark’s “cultural” religion—secular Lutheranism—resembles other “cultural” religions such as secular Judaism.
Because hardly anything that appears simple, is simple, a reviewer of Zuckerman’s book, Michal Pagis, raises several thorny questions. Even hardcore cheerleaders of Denmark’s “society without God” should pause to wonder whether important complexities and tensions remain to be identified.
Many of Pagis’ questions (which appear below) were posed by the intellectually-honest Zuckerman. Although he attempts to address some of them, he acknowledges that they will require further research to answer:
- Are people around the globe less interested in ultimate existential questions than philosophers or religious scholars have long assumed?
- What is the connection between secularism and the lack of interest in the meaning of life and death?
- How do we explain the fact that novels, poetry, or philosophical texts tackle these questions (and that there is a market for them)?
- Why are secular Jews (and other relatively secular Europeans like the French and the Germans) attracted to these questions, but not secular Danes?
- Could the long religious monopoly of Lutheranism, and hence the lack of competition among religions have led to a loss of interest in religion among the Danes and Swedes?
- Could Denmark’s high degree of social and economic security explain the low interest in religion?
- Could the high percentage of independent women and the rise of feminism account for the decline of Christianity in Denmark?
- Is it possible that Scandinavian society was never a religious one?
Resource: Michal Pagis, review of Society Without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us about Contentment by Phil Zuckerman, Journal of the American Academy of Religion 79:1 (March 2011): 264-267.
You’ve also got to ask yourself what it means when 25% of the people believe in a personal God (presumably 75% believe in another kind of god or no god…it would be interesting to know more about that breakdown) but 100% identify as Christian. Why didn’t this supposed religion scholar ask the question that “makes” a Christian: “Do you believe in any sense that Jesus Christ is your savior?” and unpack what it meant “to be a Christian” in this secular nation.
I have not read the original book. But it seems to me that either the reviewer picked and chose in an odd way, or the scholar is a bit clueless…
Or, piggybacking on Christine’s question, a non-leading way to unpack what they mean by “I am a Christian” would be to simply ask: “What does that mean to you?”
There are lots of secular Jews so it doesn’t surprise me at all to learn about secular Christians. It would interest me very much to know more about their relationship to Christianity. The reviewer’s questions are a good start.
BTW, your Nakedness, it’s a pleasure to find your blog, which I did via your comment on mine. I don’t think you’re on UUpdates.net. You’re now on my blogroll, however (unless of course you prefer not to be).